• Clinical science

Laparoscopic surgery

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive technique used to perform surgical procedures within the abdominal cavity, utilizing specialized instruments introduced through small incisions made on the abdominal wall. The abdominal cavity is first accessed using a trocar or a Veress needle, most commonly in the midline (peri-umbilical region). The peritoneal cavity is then insufflated with carbon dioxide (CO2). A fiber-optic instrument (laparoscope) is inserted into the first trocar to visualize the abdominal cavity and to allow for other ports to be created under direct vision. Laparoscopy is often the preferred diagnostic procedure for most elective gastrointestinal and gynecological surgeries. It is contraindicated in patients with shock, cardiac/pulmonary failure, and in cases of dilated bowel loops/perforation peritonitis. There are several advantages of laparoscopy over laparotomy as the incisions used are much smaller (e.g., less postoperative pain, fewer respiratory complications). However, the surgery is technically more challenging and complications (e.g., hemorrhage, bowel injury) are difficult to control laparoscopically. Complications unique to laparoscopy (secondary to CO2 insufflation of the peritoneal cavity) include hypercarbia, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, venous air embolism, and postoperative shoulder pain. Proper patient selection and good surgical technique minimize the risks and complications of laparoscopy.

Indications

  • Nearly all elective abdominopelvic surgeries can be performed laparoscopically.
  • A few examples include:
    • Gastrointestinal surgery: e.g., cholecystectomy, appendectomy, hernia repair, bowel resection
    • Gynecological surgery: e.g., hysterectomy, oophorectomy
    • Urological surgery: e.g., nephrectomy, pyeloplasty
    • Diagnostic laparoscopy: allows direct visualization of the abdominal cavity, as well as biopsy of suspicious areas (lymphadenopathy) or collection of peritoneal fluid (for culture or cytology) through small incisions in the abdominal wall. Commonly used to avoid laparotomy in the following situations →
      • Evaluation of acute abdominal pain with negative imaging
      • Abdominal trauma with negative imaging when an intra-abdominal injury is suspected (e.g., diaphragmatic tear)
      • Staging of cancers
      • To determine resectability of cancers: gastric cancer, pancreatic/biliary tract cancer, etc.

References:[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Contraindications

  • Absolute contraindications
  • Relative contraindications
    • Cardiac failure
    • Pulmonary failure Helium has been proposed as an alternative insufflating gas in patients with pulmonary failure. But it's safety profile is yet to be established
    • Pregnancy/large pelvic masses
    • Soft tissue infection at port sites
    • Expected (extensive) adhesions from a previous abdominal surgery Open technique for trocar insertion is recommended in this group of patients if the surgeon decides to operate laparoscopically.
    • Abdominal aortic aneurysm (may be associated with increased risk of vascular rupture)

References:[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

We list the most important contraindications. The selection is not exhaustive.

Procedure/application

  • Anesthesia: general anesthesia (most common), spinal anesthesia with/without epidural anesthesia may be used in some cases
  • Access to the peritoneal cavity (laparoscopic entry): A trocar/Veress needle is inserted through the abdominal wall (generally midline) into the peritoneal cavity.
    • Open technique (Hassan technique): The trocar is inserted under direct vision.
    • Closed technique: entry into the abdomen using a Veress needle
    • Visual entry technique: Uses a transparent trocar, connected to a laparoscope, to directly visualize each layer of the abdominal wall as it is being advanced
  • Creating a pneumoperitoneum: The peritoneal cavity is insufflated with carbon dioxide (CO2). The safety profile of the other gasses is still under consideration and they each have their advantages and disadvantages. E.g., cautery cannot be used if NO is the insufflating gas since it is combustible. The risk of gas embolism, though rare, is higher with argon and helium since these gasses are insoluble in blood.
    • Allows visualization of abdominal contents and creation of operative space
    • Raises intra-abdominal pressure due to the insufflation of gas within a closed cavity
  • Creation of other port sites
  • Removal of instruments and trocars
  • Evacuation of pneumoperitoneum
  • Closure of the port sites: Fascia of port sites > 5 mm must be sutured at the end of the surgery.

References:[3][7][14][15][16][17]

Advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy

  • Advantages of laparoscopy over laparotomy include:
    • Less postoperative pain, which leads to:
    • Shorter duration of postoperative ileus
    • Better cosmetic outcome (smaller scars)
    • Less intra-abdominal adhesion formation
  • Disadvantages of laparoscopy are mainly technical:
    • The surgical field is converted to a two-dimensional image on a monitor.
    • Technically more challenging than laparotomy
    • Difficulty in controlling intra-operative hemorrhage
    • Laparoscopy-specific complications (see below)
    • More expensive than a laparotomy procedure

Complications

Most intra-operative complications (pneumothorax, respiratory acidosis, air embolism) are indications to convert the procedure to a laparotomy (open procedure).

References:[1][9][11][12][17][17][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]

We list the most important complications. The selection is not exhaustive.

  • 1. Holzheimer RG, Mannick JA, Sayek I, Onat D, Lerut T. Surgical Treatment: Evidence-Based and Problem-Oriented. W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag GmbH.; 2001.
  • 2. Gould J, Ponsky TA, Blatnik J. Instruments and Devices Used in Laparoscopic Surgery. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/instruments-and-devices-used-in-laparoscopic-surgery. Last updated February 18, 2016. Accessed April 4, 2017.
  • 3. Ballehaninna UK. Exploratory Laparoscopy. In: Roberts KE. Exploratory Laparoscopy. New York, NY: WebMD. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1829816. Updated January 29, 2016. Accessed April 4, 2017.
  • 4. Walsh RM, Heniford BT. Role of laparoscopy for Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Semin Surg Oncol. 1999; 16(4): pp. 284–292. pmid: 10332774.
  • 5. Gray HJ. Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum: Staging and Initial Surgical Management. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/cancer-of-the-ovary-fallopian-tube-and-peritoneum-staging-and-initial-surgical-management. Last updated November 22, 2016. Accessed April 4, 2017.
  • 6. Marks J. Diagnostic Staging Laparoscopy: General Principles for Staging Primary Digestive Malignancies. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/diagnostic-staging-laparoscopy-general-principles-for-staging-primary-digestive-malignancies. Last updated August 10, 2016. Accessed April 4, 2017.
  • 7. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Guidelines for Diagnostic Laparoscopy. https://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/guidelines-for-diagnostic-laparoscopy/. Updated April 1, 2010. Accessed April 4, 2017.
  • 8. Bardawil T. Operative Laparoscopy. In: Isaacs C. Operative Laparoscopy. New York, NY: WebMD. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1848486-overview. Updated December 27, 2015. Accessed April 4, 2017.
  • 9. Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Leavitt DA. Atlas of Laparoscopic and Robotic Urologic Surgery. Elsevier; 2017.
  • 10. Kamine TH, Papavassiliou E, Schneider BE. Effect of abdominal insufflation for laparoscopy on intracranial pressure. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149(4): pp. 380–382. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3024.
  • 11. Perrin M, Fletcher A. Laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2004; 4(4): pp. 107–110. doi: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkh032.
  • 12. Crozier TA. Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Cambridge University Press; 2004.
  • 13. Shayani V, Siegert C, Favia P. The role of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the treatment of patients with chronic abdominal pain or recurrent bowel obstruction. JSLS. 2002; 6(2): pp. 111–114. url: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043421/.
  • 14. Bajwa SJ, Kulshrestha A. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: General vs regional anaesthesia. J Minim Access Surg. 2015; 12(1): pp. 4–9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.169952.
  • 15. Arthurs GJ, Sudhakar M. Carbon dioxide transport. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2005; 5(6): pp. 207–210. doi: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mki050.
  • 16. Hamood MA, Mishra RK. Different port closure techniques in laparoscopy surgery. World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery. 2009; 2(3): pp. 29–38. url: https://www.laparoscopyhospital.com/portclosure.pdf.
  • 17. Whelan RL, Fleshman JW Jr, Fowler DL, Are Ch, Talamini MA, Ludwig KA. The Sages Manual: Perioperative Care in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Springer; 2006.
  • 18. Kavic MS, Levinson CJ, Wettr PA, Ott DE. Prevention & Management of Laparoendoscopic Surgical Complications. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons; 1999.
  • 19. Mendoza KCh, Suarez GC, Suguimoto A. Anesthesia crisis in laparoscopic surgery: Bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax: Diagnosis and management, case report. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2015; 43(2): pp. 163–166. doi: 10.1016/j.rcae.2015.01.006.
  • 20. Kouritas VK, Papagiannopoulos K, Lazaridis G, et al. Pneumomediastinum. J Thorac Dis. 2015; 7(Suppl 1): pp. S44–49. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.11.
  • 21. Wetter PA, Kavic MS, Nezhat C, et al. Prevention & Management of Laparoendoscopic Surgical Complications.
  • 22. Ott DE. Subcutaneous emphysema: beyond the pneumoperitoneum. JSLS. 2014; 18(1): pp. 1–7. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422520882.
  • 23. Gordy S, Rowell S. Vascular air embolism. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2013; 3(1): pp. 73–76. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.109428.
  • 24. Holzheimer RG. Laparoscopic procedures as a risk factor of deep venous thrombosis, superficial ascending thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 2004; 9(9): pp. 417–422. pmid: 15546806.
  • Neuhaus SJ, Gupta A, Watson DI. Helium and other alternative insufflation gases for laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15(6): pp. 553–560. doi: 10.1007/s004640080060.
last updated 10/29/2018
{{uncollapseSections(['t0XX39', 'u0Xp39', 'E0X839', 'w0XhR9', '9OcNuc0', 'C0XqR9'])}}