ambossIconambossIcon

Dieulafoy lesion

Last updated: October 16, 2025

Summarytoggle arrow icon

A Dieulafoy lesion is a vascular anomaly characterized by an abnormally large, tortuous submucosal artery that erodes the overlying GI mucosa, leading to severe and sometimes recurrent bleeding without a primary ulcer, inflammation, or other vascular abnormality. It typically manifests in the fifth decade of life and more commonly occurs in men than women. Dieulafoy lesions account for a small percentage of acute GI bleeds, and the exact cause is unknown. The most common location for the lesion is the stomach. Clinical features include melena, hematemesis, and signs of hemodynamic instability. The diagnosis is primarily made via esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which may need to be repeated. If EGD is inconclusive, CT angiography or conventional angiography may be performed. Management begins with hemodynamic stabilization, followed by first-line endoscopic hemostasis (e.g., band ligation, clips, thermal coagulation). For refractory or recurrent bleeding, options include angiographic embolization or surgery.

Definitionstoggle arrow icon

A Dieulafoy lesion is a vascular anomaly characterized by a tortuous, abnormally large submucosal artery that erodes the overlying mucosa, leading to severe GI bleeding without an ulcer, inflammation, or other vascular abnormality. [1][2]

Epidemiologytoggle arrow icon

  • Frequency
    • Accounts for ∼ 1–2% of acute GI bleeds [2]
    • Accounts for up to 6.5% of acute nonvariceal upper GI bleeds [1]
  • Age: can occur at any age but most commonly between 40 and 49 years of age [2][3]
  • Sex: > (∼ 2:1) [2][3]
  • Location

Epidemiological data refers to the US, unless otherwise specified.

Etiologytoggle arrow icon

The exact cause is unknown; it is unclear if the lesion is congenital or acquired. [1][2][3]

Risk factors [1]

Clinical featurestoggle arrow icon

Patients are often asymptomatic until the onset of bleeding. [2]

Diagnosistoggle arrow icon

EGD [4]

  • Preferred initial study
  • Supportive findings [3]
    • Active arterial spurting or oozing from a mucosal defect < 3 mm
    • Visible vessel protruding through normal-appearing mucosa
    • Adherent clot on a small mucosal defect
    • Absence of a surrounding ulcer or significant erosion
  • Repeat endoscopy may be necessary if initial testing is nondiagnostic. [2][4]

Additional testing

Angiography [2][3]

Further endoscopic testing [4]

Differential diagnosestoggle arrow icon

The differential diagnoses listed here are not exhaustive.

Managementtoggle arrow icon

See “Initial management of overt GI bleeding” for immediate measures for acute GI bleeding, including hemodynamic stabilization for unstable patients (e.g., IV fluid resuscitation, blood transfusion). [3][4]

Endoscopic hemostasis [1]

  • First-line treatment
  • Techniques
    • Mechanical therapy (preferred) [5]
    • Thermal coagulation [4][5]
      • Heater probe coagulation
      • Bipolar/multipolar electrocoagulation
      • Argon plasma coagulation
    • Sclerosant injection therapy (e.g., ethanol) [5]
    • Epinephrine injection: may be used in combination with other modalities [4]

Alternative treatment options [1]

  • Consider if endoscopic management is insufficient and in patients with recurrent bleeding.
  • Options

Complicationstoggle arrow icon

We list the most important complications. The selection is not exhaustive.

Icon of a lock3 free articles left this month

Start a 5-day free trial or sign up for unlimited access.
 Evidence-based content, created and peer-reviewed by clinicians. Read the disclaimer